<<
back to portfolio
Copyright 2002 The Washington Post
December 14, 2002 Saturday
Boston's Cardinal
Resigns Over Sex Abuse Scandal
Alan Cooperman and Pamela
Ferdinand, Washington Post Staff Writers
Nearly a year after the
scandal over clergy sexual abuse erupted in his archdiocese, Boston's
Cardinal Bernard F. Law resigned yesterday, apologizing for his
mistakes and saying he hoped his departure would usher in a period
of healing.
Law tendered his resignation in a morning meeting with Pope John
Paul II at the Vatican, and it was immediately accepted, the Vatican
announced. Auxiliary Bishop Richard G. Lennon, a relative newcomer
to Boston who is untainted by the scandal, was appointed as a temporary
administrator until the pope chooses a new archbishop.
"It is my fervent prayer that this action may help the Archdiocese
of Boston to experience the healing, reconciliation and unity which
are so desperately needed," Law said in a written statement.
"To all those who have suffered from my shortcomings and mistakes,
I both apologize and from them beg forgiveness."
Law's resignation came after steadily increasing evidence that he
failed to remove sexually abusive priests, and with his archdiocese
teetering on bankruptcy under the burden of hundreds of lawsuits
by alleged victims.
There was no immediate word on what Law, 71, the most senior Roman
Catholic prelate in the United States and the archbishop of Boston
since 1984, will do next. But church experts said he would almost
certainly remain a cardinal and could be named to a post at the
Vatican. His statement said "the particular circumstances of
this time suggest a quiet departure."
Although several U.S. bishops have been forced to retire because
of the sexual abuse scandal, Law is the first to resign because
of his mishandling of the problem, without being personally implicated
in sexual misconduct.
Law's brief statement did not explain why he was stepping down now,
after months of demands by sexual abuse victims for his resignation.
He had offered to resign at least once before, in an April visit
to the Vatican, but said afterward that the pope had encouraged
him to stay on and that he wanted to be "part of the solution"
to the scandal.
Since the beginning of December, however, Law's remaining support
among Boston's 2 million Catholics crumbled as the archdiocese considered
filing for bankruptcy, a judge ordered the release of 11,000 pages
of church files on sexual misconduct by priests, and prosecutors
sent Law a subpoena to appear before a grand jury in a widening
criminal investigation of the archdiocese.
Perhaps the most damaging in this "series of final straws,"
said the Rev. Robert Bullock, head of the 250-member Boston Priests
Forum, was a letter from 58 Boston area priests calling for Law
to resign. "The priests and people of Boston have lost confidence
in you as their spiritual leader," it said.
In a week of accelerating events, Law's subpoena was delivered last
Friday. On Saturday, he flew to Rome, canceling his weekend appearances
in Boston without explanation.
The priests' letter arrived at his empty residence Monday. Two days
later, leaders of the 25,000-member lay group Voice of the Faithful,
which previously had refrained from criticizing Law, voted overwhelmingly
to urge for his resignation.
And on Thursday, Massachusetts Attorney General Thomas Reilly said
at a news conference that although it is not yet clear whether prosecutors
will be able to bring criminal charges against leaders of the Boston
archdiocese, there is abundant evidence that those leaders engaged
in a years-long coverup of sexual abuse by priests. "The church
cared more about itself than it cared about kids," said Reilly,
a Catholic.
Donna Morrissey, a spokeswoman for the archdiocese, said yesterday
that Law will meet all of his legal obligations, including the subpoena.
Holding back tears, Morrissey told reporters that Law was "doing
okay. He's always been steadily concerned with what was in the best
interests of the Archdiocese of Boston."
Boston was in an uproar yesterday over Law's resignation. Both of
the city's newspapers ran "Extras" and television stations
were live with the story all morning. And although the cardinal's
critics -- including many alleged victims -- were pleased, a tone
of subdued sadness permeated the city, one of the nation's bastions
of Catholicism where many residents identify themselves by parish
rather than by neighborhood.
Law remains a defendant in the hundreds of civil lawsuits, but it
will now be up to Lennon, the temporary administrator, to decide
whether the Boston archdiocese should file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection to try to force a global settlement of those suits.
Lennon, 55, has been rector of St. John's Seminary in Brighton,
Mass., since 1999 and was ordained a bishop last year. He said yesterday
he would resign the seminary post and "do all I can with the
help of the bishops, priests, deacons, religious and laity of the
archdiocese, to work towards healing" the wounds left by the
scandal.
James E. Post, president of Voice of the Faithful, noted that Lennon
has met several times with abuse victims. "That gives us hope,
because if you look at what lies ahead, there's no quality more
important to the healing process than the ability to listen and
to have a genuine conversation with people of the archdiocese,"
Post said.
As a relatively new bishop, however, Lennon does not appear to be
in the running to become Boston's next cardinal. Among the likely
candidates for the post, according to church experts, are Bishop
Wilton D. Gregory of Belleville, Ill., the president of the U.S.
Conference of Catholic Bishops; Archbishop Harry Flynn of St. Paul-Minneapolis,
who heads the conference's Ad Hoc Committee on Sexual Abuse; and
Archbishop Edwin F. O'Brien, head of the vicariate of the U.S. Military
Services.
Although Vatican officials said Law raised the possibility of bankruptcy
during his discussions in Rome this week, it is unclear whether
the Vatican gave its approval.
Plaintiffs lawyers have said they believe the talk of Chapter 11
is a bluff intended to pressure victims into accepting smaller settlements
and dissuade them from bringing further lawsuits.
Bankruptcy would open the archdiocese's books, turn over control
of its finances to a civil court, bring shame on the church and
depart from the Vatican's worldwide policy of financial independence
from governments.
Law's resignation could help avoid all that, said Patrick Schiltz,
an associate dean of the University of St. Thomas Law School in
Minneapolis who has represented many U.S. dioceses in sexual abuse
lawsuits.
"I've negotiated hundreds of settlements in clergy misconduct
cases, and unlike a typical commercial case, they are emotional
events, not just financial events," Schiltz said. "The
victims in Boston just don't trust Cardinal Law, and many of them
have personalized their anger on Cardinal Law. Whether that's right
or wrong, it's been an obstacle to settlement."
Several plaintiffs' lawyers said, however, that they will continue
to pursue lawsuits and file new ones.
Mitchell Garabedian, a lawyer for scores of alleged victims of the
former priest and convicted pedophile John Geoghan, said that "just
because Bernard Cardinal Law resigns doesn't mean everything's okay
now. There's enormous rot, enormous decay in the archdiocese of
Boston. Now it has to cleanse itself."
Barbara Blaine, founder of the Survivors Network of those Abused
by Priests, said she hoped that prosecutors, the news media and
the public would now focus on New York's Cardinal Edward Egan, Los
Angeles' Cardinal Roger Mahony and Law's former deputies -- "all
of whom have done what Law himself has done, but who have avoided
proper scrutiny largely because Law himself has become such a lightning
rod." But she stopped short of calling for those prelates to
resign.
One of Geoghan's alleged victims, Patrick McSorley, said Law's resignation
"is a little too late, but at least now we know we can start
anew. I don't want to hear anymore about anymore little kids being
victimized by any more priests."
Ferdinand reported from Boston. |