Archive for February 23rd, 2010

 

Our Worst Mothers, Ourselves


Women: Please stop telling other women what to do. Let us settle (or not) for Mr. Good Enough. Let us become moms at 45 should we so choose. Don’t tell me why I shouldn’t be a working mother (or why I shouldn’t stay at home). Don’t try to scare me with poor statistics and bad science. And, as angry and frustrated as you get at other women sometimes, don’t tell me how you would like to punch some of us in the face.

What’s going on? I love having women in my life, from my closest friends to new acquaintances, still really strangers, online. I appreciate genuine concern and insights. But increasingly I have to wonder, have we become our own worst mothers?

Certainly, if we’ve experienced anything, we know better. We know there is more than one way to live a life as a woman, as confusing as it can be, and more than one path to get to where we’d like to go, even if we don’t get there. We know we can plan to have things work out one way, and they go another. When that happens, what I need most of all is information, constructive feedback, and understanding, if not loving support. What I need least of all is name-calling and moral certitude.

I am thinking about this after a series of virtual catfights on Twitter between women over who said what (in 140 characters or less) to whom and when. I could barely follow them enough to make out what the hoopla was about. In real life, women interrupt each other, we argue, we laugh (loudly), we mock ourselves more than anyone else. But Madeleine Albright said there is a special place in hell for women who do not help other women, and it makes me sad that a current dynamic in books, blogs, and social networks often plays to our demons, not to our better selves. It’s certainly easier for some of us to be rude or downright abusive when we wouldn’t even recognize one another passing on the street.

I also am thinking about how women treat other women after receiving a gracious and generous note from a dear friend. She balanced thoughtful advice and concern from her own experience with an offer of real life support: “I want to be one of your friends who reminds you…that it’s going to be a challenging juggling act to take care of your personal life while nurturing what’s next in your career, and your friends like me are here to support you. I’m good with solving the practical stuff, so please take advantage of me!” She clearly thought I could use some help, and she didn’t make me feel bad about it.

I’ve made mistakes in my life and decisions that some people would likely abhor (some of which are documented in my memoir, co-authored with two other women). We didn’t set out to write a How To book or  to suggest that our winding and bumpy journeys to love and motherhood are the only way to go. Or the best way to go. What I at least intended to do in sharing my story was to show that no path is perfect, that none of us have all the answers, that girlfriends can be powerful in your life, that you’re never too old to hope, that you’re never too old to f—k up, and that being true to yourself and your own desires — and acting on those desires — can sometimes create a kind of magic. Maybe. Who knows for sure? I sure don’t. And I don’t think anyone else does, either.

2 Comments » | Posted by Pamela on 02.23.2010 in Blog |

Use Your Words


My friend’s husband Josh sits squarely in the camp of sensitive men, and Laura is a woman who doesn’t enjoy confrontation. Like Mark and I, their communication is usually good. And like us, they are older parents thinking of expanding their family. Everyone knows kids don’t make for smooth couple sailing so I was interested in hearing about the thoughtful strategy he came up with for handling Stress & The Second Child. Even though the second child does not (yet) exist.

“How about this?” he broached the subject with Laura after an exhausting day spent traveling between cars and airports with their toddler, a delightful creature with an increasingly strong will. “We have a set of prepared index cards to give each other when things hit a low point. When we don’t want to argue, but we’re too tired or upset to talk the issue through.”

(When Laura tells this to me, a parent of one easygoing child, it makes perfect sense. But other friends with multiple children apparently jettisoned the idea. Ah, the best laid plans…those poor naive souls…good luck with that, their reactions suggested.)

“Awesome idea,” Laura told him. “One card could say, ‘I love you.’ You know I always need to hear that when things are tough.”

“And another one could read, ‘Take the next day off and do whatever you want,’” he said. Which is precisely what she said he needed in those moments: a temporary exit strategy. Time to regroup and recharge.

“On one condition: The person who takes the day off has to arrange any sitters needed for that day,” she said. He raised his eyebrows. “So you know, if the other person needs to work or something. It doesn’t seem fair to dump everything on them without much notice.” Dump everything on me, she was clearly thinking. Even I knew that much. It was transparent, but he agreed.

“What could other cards say?” Laura asked.

“How about, ‘Let’s talk about this another time.’”

“Good. ‘I’m not blaming you,’” she said.

“Blaming me for what?” he asked, looking over at her as she continued to drive.

“Nothing. That was a card idea.”

“Oh.”

Close call. Which got me thinking: Was this such a good idea after all? Could these cards actually get them into fights? Maybe they should put a Twitter-type limit on them so there’s no misunderstandings. Six words or less? 200 characters?

Even then, it’s probably best to steer clear of profanity and sarcasm. Keep things G-rated. Messages with such economy of scale could sound louder and more brusque than intended, like they do on Twitter or cell phone texts.

“Love you really” could mean be interpreted as sentimental “Love you, REALLY” or passive-aggressive “Love you. Really.” “I need to be alone” could be taken as angry “I need to be ALONE” or sad “I NEED to be alone.” Not to mention any combination of letters and words that could signal security or separation in the throes of an argument, making the whole episode that much worse.

Maybe the ground rules should include being cautious with verbs and limiting adjectives and adverbs (a good idea anyway, some editors of mine have said). Something simple could suffice: “Let’s talk later.” “You could be right.” “Let me think.” “This hurts.” And, with or without kids, certainly the key is also being cautious with how we say the things that get us into high-stress trouble in the first place. And learning when it’s time to pack it in, pass on the cards, and just say, “I’m sorry.”

2 Comments » | Posted by Pamela on 02.17.2010 in Blog |

Bowie, My Muse


David. Not David Bowie. Not Mr. Bowie. Not even Bowie. David. That’s what my parents call him. For instance, Dad: “I saw David on the Regis Philbin show the other morning.” Mom: “They’re doing an interview with David on the radio right now. Just thought you might want to know.” That’s how close they feel to him. And to me.

For years as a besotted and music-crazed teen-ager, I plastered my bedroom walls with Bowie posters and song lyrics typed on individual sheets of spiral notebook paper (along with others from the Clash, Pretenders, Beatles, Boomtown Rats, and Elvis Costello). My friend Melissa and I dressed up in cheap tuxedos and sat in the first row with scalped tickets for his concerts in the ‘80s, throwing a dozen roses on the stage at one point and holding up an old bed sheet spraypainted with a Turkish greeting from one of his albums. (I am proud, not even embarrassed, to note that he put one of the roses between his teeth and stopped mid-performance to read the sheet message aloud. Sigh.) I even wrote my senior high school dissertation on Bowie. It got an “A,” and I sent it to a vanity publishing house. It was never printed, but Mom began referring to it as my first book. To this day, years after living in London not far from his old Brixton stomping ground, I keep Ziggy Stardust a constant on my iPod playlist. And I try not to get too jealous when my significant other tells the story of how he met Bowie at a Manhattan party years ago. Maybe a little jealous.

Writers are often asked about the writers who influenced them, and my co-authors and I are starting to get that question as we prepare for interviews and fill out questionnaires for our publishers and book-related Web sites. I sometimes have a hard time with it. Don’t get me wrong. I love books. Love to read. Admire many authors — from Annie Proulx and Michael Chabon to Tolstoy, Alice Munro (heartbreaking first short story in her new book, by the way), and Jeannette Walls. And experience great joy in my daughter’s love of what passes for literature at age 2: Curious George is the livre du jour. (BTW, Steve Miller Band the music of the week.)

But for me, visual artists and musicians like Bowie can just as well be the ones who give me inspiration and energy. They elevate my mood when it’s low. They make me excited to write when I don’t want to. They can be famous strangers or close friends (or famous friends) — Adam Rothberg, a Boston-based musician whose songwriting has been compared to Paul McCartney, or Ann Tracy, a New York artist who creates glorious paintings, or Janet Echelman, whose ethereal nets will be showcased at the Vancouver Winter Games. I am stunned by their ability to visualize and create art or music that looks like it has always had a place in the world, or should have, when in fact it was spun from imagination and culled from thin air. By doing so, they give me the courage to think that maybe I can, too. Or at least it’s worth trying. I find the pain of not creating is worse than creating, even if winds up on the cutting room floor. As it often does.

And so, I turned to Lucy Kaplansky, the wonderful folksinger who kvells at every live performance over her daughter (adopted from China not so very long ago), to carry me through much of the writing of my story in Three Wishes. So did Dar Williams and Richard Shindell, her former partners in Cry Cry Cry, along with Bruce Springsteen and Antje Duvekot for some tough rewrites. Alexi Murdoch, whose music was featured in the film “Away We Go,” kept me going through final edits and plays even now in the background as I write this. My co-authors Carey Goldberg, Beth Jones, and I used the Bowie songwriting technique to brainstorm a subtitle, moving around dozens of words on individual pieces of paper on a countertop until we found a string of words that seemed just right.

In high school and college, I could study for tests and write school papers to the drumbeat and heavy guitar of Led Zeppelin and Boston. Now, though, it’s more gentle strumming and lyrical storytelling that transports me. I’m as picky about what’s playing as some writers are about starting their work with a #2 pencil and a yellow legal pad, or at a desk facing southeast. Once it starts playing, I begin to see my story almost as a film reel set to a soundtrack, and eventually the music fades until I lift my pen or stop typing and hear it once again.

No Comments » | Posted by Pamela on 02.12.2010 in Blog |

Behind the Scenes


Some snapshots from our fun book video shoot as recently filmed by Emmy-nominated Jackie Mow, with her talented crew Jessie and Laura. Jackie is a gifted producer and director whose work has appeared on NOVA (including the series “World in the Balance”), American Experience, and National Geographic Explorer, among other programs. Most recently, Jackie produced and directed “A Girl’s Life with Rachel Simmons,” featuring the acclaimed researcher and author exploring the issues around girls entering adulthood in the next decade.

Coming up: The Today Show – April 21, with events to follow at venues in Boston, New York, and Chicago including Printers Row Lit Fest! Please join us when and where you can.



No Comments » | Posted by Pamela on 02.11.2010 in Blog |

Generating a Generation


The way Dad recently looked with adoration at Emma reminded me of his reaction when he saw her for the first time as a baby on one of our last ultrasounds. Like she was the Second Coming. And he’s Jewish.

He didn’t anticipate that she would be a living, moving girl on the screen before us – and how could he? He was a father-to-be in small town, rural Virginia in the mid-1960s, well before the era of 3-D ultrasounds and genetic testing. I can only imagine the mystery and fear and excitement he and my mom must have felt before me (and my brother) were born. Or maybe they were young enough and lacking enough in today’s smorgasbord of technology not to be unduly worried, allowed to be more gloriously carefree than I was. They were in their 20s having a baby. I was in my 40s.

And here he was last week, on our quick winter break in the sun, Dad — my Dad, the one who pretended he was an undersea monster in the swimming pool, making faces, and chasing my brother and I — scooting Emma around on a kickboard as her grandfather. He said he thought of me then, and I thought of him. The scene was straight out of our vacations in Miami Beach, minus the coconut oil suntan lotion and geriatric bathers with walkers and gold flip flops. It conjured memories of floating in the water in my stiff blue swim vest with dolphins on it and trusting Dad to motor my little body around the perimeter safely. Now it was Emma in her little vest, holding his hands, kicking and trying to blow bubbles.

And Mom? I caught her and Emma dancing their hearts out one afternoon outside a restaurant where speakers pumped music outside. (My parents are long divorced so we split our getaway between them in two different locations. Such a modern family, we are.) Back to Emma and Mom: They were flailing their arms and twirling in circles, oblivious to spectators. My mom was smiling so hard it looked like her face might crack. It’s not an uncommon sight. Ditto Mark’s mum. She’s investing in cuddly animal toys and toddler books to animate Skype conversations with her granddaughter overseas.

I had no idea — how could I? — that having a daughter was not just about creating my own little family but an expansive one with unique, private relationships between her and her grandparents. Which is how it should be. I am not planning to intrude. I expect and hope that, like my relationships with my grandparents and even my great-grandparents, hers will be free of the adolescent angst and growing pains and spirit of rebellion that complicated our parent-daughter lives.

I am embarrassed and ashamed to admit that my parents, who never pressured me for a grandchild, were really the farthest thing from my mind when I wanted to have a baby. Really, it was all about me. It was about finding my partner (not their son-in-law), having my child (not their grandchild), creating a generation after me (not them). I was naive and self-absorbed enough not to consider how their identities and priorities might shift and how their perspectives about their lives and legacies might be redefined. (Not wholly, of course. My parents have individually accomplished too much on their own to be defined by any other person, especially such a little one.)

Sure, I thought they would make wonderful grandparents. But I never realized the extent such a life-changing event for me would change their lives, returning them to memories of their own childhoods, their own parenthoods. To rediscovering ways of sealing the earliest imprints of happiness and family on this indelible, almost unexpected life.

2 Comments » | Posted by Pamela on 02.04.2010 in Blog |